MOTM · Barriers & Needs of Women of Migrant Background in Sport

Barriers and Needs of Women of Migrant Background to Participate in Sport

Module progress: 0/5 completed (0%)

What you’ll do here: Understand how overlapping identities shape sport participation, explore the nine common barriers and four specific barriers identified in MOTM research, and apply practical actions in mentoring.

Intersectionality and sport (8–10 min)
Key message: Women of migrant background may face several barriers at the same time. Mentors should look at the combination, not only one barrier.

Intersectionality means that people experience sport through multiple identity factors at once (for example: gender, migration status, class, religion, age, language, disability).

For mentors, this matters because barriers rarely come one by one — they usually overlap in daily life.

14 dimensions of identity in sport inclusion context
Different identity factors can interact and shape access to sport in different ways.

Four sport-specific examples

Gender + migration status

A newly arrived woman from Syria wants to join a local fitness class.

  • As a woman, she may feel less comfortable in mixed-gender spaces.
  • As a newcomer, she may not know how local clubs work yet.

Combined effect: she may feel unsure where to start.

Religion + gender

A Muslim woman who wears a hijab wants to swim.

  • Her beliefs may require women-only sessions.
  • Mixed facilities may feel uncomfortable.

If women-only options are missing, participation is limited.

Income + migration

A single mother from Eritrea wants to enrol her child in football.

  • Club fees are difficult to afford.
  • She may not know available subsidies.

Without practical support, participation becomes unlikely.

Language + cultural norms

A woman from Afghanistan joins a local running group.

  • Limited language skills make social connection harder.
  • Clothing and participation norms may feel unfamiliar.

Even after joining, she may still feel isolated.

Quick self-check

In your context, which combinations appear most often?

  • Gender + language
  • Care responsibilities + cost
  • Religion + facility design
  • Migration status + information access

There is no single correct answer — use this as a team discussion prompt.

Reflection exercise: identity walk

  • Start: Reflect on your own identity factors (e.g., gender, class, migration status, religion, age, ability).
  • Task: Choose 3–4 factors and note how they may influence access to sport.
  • Debrief: Discuss how overlapping factors shape barriers for women of migrant background.
  • Online option: Use breakout rooms or anonymous boards.

Mentor Tips

  • Ask open questions — let the mentee define what matters most to her.
  • Expect overlapping barriers rather than one single cause.
  • Avoid stereotypes; each person’s situation is different.
Barriers: common vs specific (12–15 min)
Key message: Most barriers are practical and layered. Small supports (information, first contact, childcare, fee support) can make a major difference.
“At first, I felt unsure because I didn’t know anyone and struggled with English... But the community dance program changed that: they welcomed me and provided childcare.” — Sahra, sport participant from Somalia.

MOTM literature work highlighted nine common barriers to participation for women of migrant background. For safeguarding and escalation pathways related to these barriers, see Module 3: Safeguarding.

What it is: Missing women-only spaces, unsuitable rules, or environments that feel uncomfortable.

In practice: Mixed-gender settings or unsuitable dress policies can reduce participation.

What helps: Women-only sessions, female instructors, and flexible clothing options.

Good practice: Women-only pool hours with female instructors increased attendance and perceived safety.

What it is: Direct or subtle exclusion linked to race, ethnicity, religion, or migration background.

In practice: Women may leave sport environments where they feel judged or unwelcome.

What helps: Anti-racism training, clear zero-tolerance policies, and inclusive club culture.

Good practice: Coach training + anti-discrimination policy improved belonging and retention.

What it is: Multiple disadvantages acting together (e.g., gender + class + migration status).

In practice: One-size-fits-all programmes miss real-life complexity.

What helps: Flexible design (timing, childcare, affordability, language support).

Good practice: Flexible schedules + childcare supported participation for migrant mothers.

What it is: Care duties, work pressure, and social expectations reduce available time and energy.

In practice: Women may prioritise family needs over their own activity.

What helps: Family-friendly formats, flexible attendance, and supportive communication.

Good practice: “Family sport” formats made participation possible for mothers.

What it is: Feeling inexperienced, unfit, or uncertain about rules and expectations.

In practice: Fear of embarrassment prevents joining.

What helps: Beginner groups, non-competitive formats, and encouragement-focused coaching.

Good practice: “Beginner first” classes improved confidence and transition to mainstream clubs.

What it is: Not knowing where to go, who to contact, or how to join.

In practice: Opportunities exist, but do not reach the women who need them.

What helps: Peer ambassadors, personal invitations, and trusted local networks.

Good practice: Peer-to-peer invitations increased trust and participation.

What it is: Fees, transport, and equipment costs are too high.

In practice: Women postpone or avoid participation.

What helps: Subsidies, free trial periods, equipment banks, and reduced fees.

Good practice: Membership subsidies + second-hand equipment removed cost barriers.

What it is: Limited host-language proficiency affects understanding and connection.

In practice: Instructions may feel unclear or intimidating.

What helps: Simple language, visuals, bilingual support, and demonstration-based coaching.

Good practice: Bilingual facilitation and movement-based instruction reduced language anxiety.

What it is: Few visible leaders or athletes with migrant backgrounds.

In practice: Women may not see sport spaces as “for people like me”.

What helps: Visible diverse leadership, mentoring, and inclusive communication campaigns.

Good practice: Featuring migrant-background coaches and mentors improved motivation and retention.

Specific barriers identified in MOTM questionnaires

MOTM questionnaires (women of migrant background + service providers) identified four additional barriers that often appear in local delivery contexts.

Barriers to participation reported in MOTM surveys
Barriers to participation reported in MOTM surveys.

Feeling of non-belonging often comes from several factors together (gender, migration status, class, age, ethnicity), not from one single cause.

Barriers in practice: scenario exercise

Use these short cases to identify barriers and choose one practical mentoring response.

1) Fatima (17) — swimming & faith

Likes to swim and wants to join a club. She wears a hijab; her parents worry about mixed-gender teams; her English is limited.

Your notes (saved on this device only):

2) Amira (29) — running & single parent

Recently moved and a single mother. She wants to join a running club but cannot afford sports gear.

Your notes (saved on this device only):

Mentor Tips

  • Start with open questions; do not assume priorities.
  • Focus on one or two practical next steps.
  • Offer first-contact support (first visit, message draft, map, subsidy info).
How to promote participation? (8 min)
Key message: Inclusion grows when programmes combine practical access (cost, childcare, transport, language) with safety, respect, and leadership opportunities.

Because barriers are layered, solutions should also be layered.

General recommendations

  • Plan for combined barriers: time, childcare, transport, and cost.
  • Offer childcare options or family-friendly formats where possible.
  • Keep activities affordable and close to where participants live.
  • Use clear communication: simple language, visuals, trusted channels.
  • Make participation flexible but predictable (regular rhythm helps retention).
  • Create a welcoming atmosphere with respectful facilitation.
  • Include women of migrant background in planning, delivery, and leadership.

Specific recommendations from women of migrant background

Facilities and costs infographic
What helps most: nearby facilities and low/no participation costs.

Specific recommendations from service providers

  • Reduce cost barriers (discounts, free sessions, gear support).
  • Increase comfort (women-only groups, female coaches, privacy options).
  • Improve communication (interpreters, multilingual info, visual guidance).
  • Use trusted bridge persons from relevant communities.
  • Collaborate with local NGOs, community centres, and municipalities.
Key takeaways
  • Barriers are layered; responses should be layered too.
  • Small practical supports can unlock participation quickly.
  • Representation and leadership sustain long-term inclusion.

Mentor Tips

  • Begin with low-threshold, nearby options and build momentum.
  • Explore motivation (health, joy, social connection, confidence).
  • Offer choices that respect cultural and personal comfort.

Reflection Note

Based on this page, what two changes could your organisation make in the next month to lower barriers for women of migrant background?